Search This Blog

Monday, November 10, 2025

The Problem With U.S. Healthcare Is It Is Designed To Deliver Reimburseable Interventions-Not Health

 Healthcare in the United States is largely designed for reimbursement based on medical interventions that are not necessarily linked to creating health. Though the nation has excellent critical and specialty care facilities, the system fails to adequately account for critical factors impacting health including environmental, socio-economic, and access to care. These are fundamental contributors for health, but the hectic and excessively expensive health system of the U.S. doesn’t include them in most metrics of performance. The message is that the nation has chosen to treat late-stage chronic disease, provide for critical care, and accept mortality rates that are some of the worst in the industrialized world for suicide, gun deaths, and maternal deaths.

For example, the maternal mortality rate in the United States is four times as high compared to European nations. And this metric has not improved in over a decade. Women die because of complications from childbirth, which is largely preventable, and most of these deaths occur after discharge from the birthing facility. The Commonwealth Fund, a Massachusetts nonprofit health systems research group published a maternal mortality report in 2024 confirming the areas where the US is an outlier in maternal health. (Munira Z. Gunja, 2024) The article reviewed metrics which contribute to maternal health and mortality for nations with high income and national health programs, including Europe as well as Chile, Korea, and Japan. The rate of c-section births is much higher in the U.S. compared to most of these countries as well. (Joan Stephenson, 2022) Two thirds of the deaths in the United States occurred in the first forty-two days following childbirth and reflect a gross inadequacy of post-natal care. And most appalling, the maternal mortality rate for black women in the U.S. is 49.5 deaths per 100,000 births. That ranks with developing countries with poor access to health care. Clearly there is a lack of patient follow-up care for mothers in the United States.

Maternal Mortality Metrics

Best Nation

USA Rank

Maternal Deaths per 100,000 live births

Norway-less than 1 death per 100,000 live births

22 per 100,000 live births

Number of C-sections

Norway-160 per 1,000 live births

320 per 1,000 live births

Access to pre- and post-natal care

Korea provides home post-natal visits for up to 2 years for vulnerable families

Healthcare system does not guarantee maternity coverage, based on the state Medicaid plans and private insurance standards

Number of OB Gyns

Germany-27 per 1,000 mothers

12 per 1,000 mothers

Number of Midwives

Chile-80 per 1,000 mothers

  4 per 1,000 mothers

Federally Mandated Paid Maternal Leave

Norway-86 days paid leave

None, 25% of women have private employer paid leave

 Tulane University ran a study that reviewed maternal mortality and restrictive abortion laws for 38 states and the District of Columbia and found the deaths of mothers increased by 7%. (Winter, Pregnancy in the US Just Got More Dangerous-Post Dobbs v Jackson Decision, 2022) Where is the outcry for this  travesty of preventable deaths?

Examples of how the health system does not align with creating health

Financialization of Healthcare Without Requirements to Generate Health

The financialization of healthcare by hedge funds to maximize profits without actually delivering care. This is the opposite of what public goods should do. Health should be a goal for our nation’s people and the most efficacious way to identify methods to improve health should be a mandate, not merely an option for investors. The hedge funds purchasing include; behavioral health facilities, medical devices, biotechnology, and physician practices. Hedge funds are buying healthcare-delivery assets, to make profits, not to generate health. In fact, if more people are chronically overweight, depressed, addicted, there will be more customers to buy their weight loss medicine, take the wonder drugs, enroll in specious behavior modification programs, and require medical interventions, which will add revenues to their medical device companies and specialty practices which generate lots of profits in targeted surgeries. Never mind that these procedures may be costly for patients and the health system and the health results short lived.

Purchasing healthcare assets may cause disruption in services, for example, treating the delivery of health care as a commodity, rather than a public health property can reduce the availability of care when physician practices are consolidated. This is rarely to the advantage of patient care but is marketed as an improvement to regulators. For example, when Harrison Hospital was purchased by a Catholic hospital group, the first thing it did was expand urgent care clinics and facilities in wealthier areas and ultimately close the hospital in Bremerton, Washington, which provided care for many veterans, low-income residents, and persons with mental health and addiction issues. (Winter, Hospital Closures and the Impact on Health Services, 2016)This too was billed as nondisruptive, but when a community of 39,000 people loses its hospital, this is disruptive. The message-a disruption in services to the less wealthy is not a significant concern to the healthcare group. Take-a-way-from the boardroom-why deliver services in a poorer area, when the company can make more money by serving the wealthier, bonuses all around.

Nonprofit Hospitals Which Have Converted to For-profit

First, why is shaving money off the top for shareholders a good technique for improving health care, and how will this contribute to affordability? The most affordable health care program in the U.S. is Medicare, a government run program for seniors and disabled persons, which has the lowest administrative cost (6%) of any program public or private. Steward Hospitals is an example of a private equity deal from the purchase of the nonprofit hospital Caritas Christi in Massachusetts. The hedge fund then sold off the assets of the hospitals (land) and created a second company for lease revenues from the hospitals which now paid rent to the hedge fund owners. True to form, those investors made all of their money in the first three years and spun off Steward to a physician group and walked away with leaseholds. The physician group, made up of some of the original members of the hospitals, started to lose money and within a decade the hospitals were auctioned off to other entities, but two failed to survive, Carney Hospital and Nashoba Valley Medical Center. The patients in rural Massachusetts and inner-city Boston have had to scramble to find care. (Brownstein, 2024) This seems more like the casualties of war, people treated as detritus in the machinery of for-profit healthcare-health entities operated without concern for the people they are supposed to serve. I wonder how many people died who couldn’t get to a hospital in their area?

Ninety percent of private equity deals in the health care sector are never reviewed for public interest or unintended consequences. Private equity funds are short-term profit driven and not geared to long-term investments in healthcare infrastructure. In 2022, according to DealBook, there were 863 healthcare deals in private equity. Only Oregon and Massachusetts have state laws which monitor private equity healthcare transactions. (The Growth of Private Equity in US Health Care: Impact and Outlook, 2025)

Reimbursement policies mostly geared toward volume and not quality of health produced

Medicare Demonstration Projects have attempted to include quality metrics and reimbursement incentives linked to procedures for health measures, especially in the realm of cardiac care, stroke treatment, and reduction in hospitalizations from improved patient care for infection control. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act attempted to invigorate preventive care and wellness through mandated annual physical and well-child-care. However, the ability of middle-class people to afford medical insurance is tenuous, the reimbursement policies vary by state and insurance plan, and immigrants without permanent residency status are denied access to the federally subsidized health insurance programs. Several states have elected to change their Medicaid plans under 1115 waivers, which affords greater flexibility in benefit design and program allocation. Washington State is designing a Medicaid program that provides additional nutritional food support, housing assistance coordination, and medical transportation services. (Washington State Healthcare Authority, 2025)This is a good example of how the metrics are being modified to look at the larger picture of health creation. Afterall, it is hard to stay healthy if you are homeless, lack adequate food, and transportation to medical services.

Because the U.S. healthcare system is geared to insurance reimbursement, many of the other factors that contribute to health are often not included in performance metrics. For example, adequate nutrition for children is a fundamental necessity in their physiological development, yet the Trump Administration has chosen to minimize funding for a Supplemental Food Program for families, at the same time, making tax cuts for billionaires permanent. This makes no sense at all for a nation which has an embarrassment of food stocks, where farmers are paid not to grow certain crops, and agribusiness receives all kinds of subsidies. Further, this cruel decision is exacerbated by the administration’s decision to limit funding for school lunches. There are literally silos of unused food in the country going to waste.

Removal of Scientific Data from Public Resources About Environmental Problems

Another important aspect of health is an environment which is safe and free from poisons, yet the Trump Administration has defunded the Environmental Protection Agency and ceased to report on environmental hazards which impact public health, like forever chemicals[RW1] . Why is it even a political decision to reduce harmful substances that endanger our health- there should be a national mandate for this. The first rule of a nation is to do no harm to its people, especially to the vulnerable.

Health and welfare of our children is being ignored by short-term public policy decisions

An aspect of health is safety is the provision of reliable affordable childcare, without this people choose not to have children, and the country will not be able to support its aging population. For many families, children are unsupervised for long periods of time. This problem was recognized in the eighties while I served as the finance chair for a Campfire group, where we made the decision to sell the camp property and set up a fund to support the Latchkey Program, which was a recognition of the dearth in childcare in the country. This was a resource targeted for school-age children who were home after-school for extended periods before their moms came home from work. I remember my son, in second grade, shivering on the steps of our home, while I trudged up the hill from the bus stop. After that, we came up with a plan where he would push the garbage can against the back gate, open it, go to the back door, and open the door with the key under the mat. I raised him to survive in a world where we were on our own. The travesty is this was our best recourse in a wealthy city in America.

Discriminatory Policy Decisions Which Harm Families and Contribute to The Unaffordability of Health Care

Further, those of us who have medical insurance, are still stuck with co-insurance liabilities that are completely unaffordable, $13,000 for co-insurance after deductibles per year? The annual burden for medical insurance for a family in the U.S. is $27,000 according to the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation. (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2024) The Patient Protection And Affordable Care Act(ACA) created a government cost neutral method for low-income and middle class people to obtain federally subsidized medical insurance by advancing tax credits. This provided medical insurance and access to treatment for thirty million people, including me. Further, the standardization of preventive care benefits, elimination of the pre-existing condition exclusion clause, and the requirement that insurance companies use at least 85% of insurance premiums to pay for medical services, has resulted in less costly care for the participants. Now, the Trump Administration wants to nullify the ingenious tax credit funding of the ACA.

Lack of regard for the mental and emotional health of the nation’s people

The U.S. has one of the highest suicide rates in the industrialized world, especially for children and youth. Suicides outnumber homicides 2 to 1. A Harvard study found that states with fewer gun restrictions have higher suicide rates and Wyoming has the nation’s highest rate at 28 people per 100,000 lives. The global suicide rate is 8.9 deaths per 100,000 people and the U.S. has the highest rate of all industrialized countries, 14.2 suicides per 100,000 people. (The Commonwealth Fund) This metric is a glaring condemnation  of the nation malaise and insufficient support for its people.

For every dollar invested in wellness, through nutrition, maternal and child health services, and environmental cleanup, we save over $5 per person. In 2008, The Trust for America’s Health found an investment of $10 per person in community-based health programs would save $5.60 in medical expenses per head. (Trust for America's Health.org, 2008)  This table shows a statewide analysis of the return on investment of the community based health initiatives.

State

Potential Annual Savings

Return on Investment

Alabama

$250 million

5.6 to

Alaska

$47 million

7.2 to 1

Arizona

$242 million

4.2 to 1

Arkansas

$139

5 to 1

California

$1.7 billion

4.8 to 1

Colorado

$232 million

5 to 1

Connecticut

$231 million

6.6 to 1

Delaware

$57 million

7 to 1

Washington, D.C.

$57 million

9.9 to 1

Florida

$1 billion

6.2 to 1

Georgia

$426 million

4.8 to 1

Hawaii

$70 million

5.6 to 1

Idaho

$62 million

4.5 to 1

Illinois

$708 million

5.6 to 1

Indiana

$343 million

5.5 to 1

Iowa

$165 million

5.6 to 1

Kansas

$155 million

5.7 to 1

Kentucky

$248 million

6 to 1

Louisiana

$234 million

5.2 to 1

Maine

$98 million

7.5 to 1

Maryland

$332 million

6 to 1

Massachusetts

$476 million

7.4 to 1

Michigan

$545 million

5.4 to 1

Minnesota

$316 million

6.2 to 1

Mississippi

$150 million

5.2 to 1

Missouri

$334 million

5.8 to 1

Montana

$51 million

5.5 to 1

Nebraska

$102 million

5.8 to 1

Nevada

$115 million

5 to 1

New Hampshire

$76 million

5.9 to 1

New Jersey

$543 million

6.3 to 1

New Mexico

$88 million

4.7 to 1

New York

$1.3 billion

7 to 1

North Carolina

$473 million

5.6 to 1

North Dakota

$39 million

6.2 to 1

Ohio

$685 million

6 to 1

Oklahoma

$183 million

5.2 to 1

Oregon

$193 million

5.4 to 1

Pennsylvania

$791 million

6.4 to 1

Rhode Island

$73 million

6.8 to 1

South Carolina

$233 million

5.6 to 1

South Dakota

$42 million

5.5 to 1

Tennessee

$351 million

6 to 1

Texas

$1 billion

4.7 to 1

Utah

$89 million

3.7 to 1

Vermont

$43 million

7 to 1

Virginia

$385 million

5.2 to 1

Washington

$343 million

5.5 to 1

West Virginia

$124 million

6.9 to 1

Wisconsin

$337 million

6.2 to 1

Wyoming

$29 million

5.8 to 1

Subscribe to the Wellness and Prevention Digest

 

Stay connected with the latest news and events in public health and at TFAH

 

These wellness programs included education and resources for improved nutrition, smoking cessation, and increased exercise. Not very sexy, but low-cost interventions that do provide long term benefits, including reductions in strokes, heart bypass surgeries, incidence of type II diabetes, and several types of cancers. Not to mention a reduction in kidney failure, neuropathy, and other chronic disease comorbidities.  Another example of the positive impact of preventive healthcare is in Hawaii. The Hawaii State Medical plan conducted an economic study of 166,000 members over a four-year-period was found to save $350 in healthcare treatment for every investment of $10. (Steven M. Schwartz, 2013)

US Spends More Money Than Any Other Nation-Where Does the Money Go

Using data for 2023 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid and other government agencies, these charts show where the healthcare dollars are spent by sector, who actually pays for the services, and how it looks on the consumer- end, by health services purchased. United States healthcare consumed 4.9 trillion dollars in 2023. These tables show who paid for it.



 

 

Source

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid

Notes

The RX or prescription drug budget is for retail scripts, not infusions or other applications

Other health care includes care through schools, residential treatment facilities for mental health, drug treatment, and community centers

Nondurable medical means-retail healthcare products, like surgical dressings, blood pressure cuffs, over the counter medicines

Durable Medical products means-contacts, eyeglasses, hearing aides

Other Professional Services means optometry, podiatry, chiropractic

Unspecified miscellaneous may include: weight loss counseling, ayruvedic health care, acupunture, massage, health retreats

Mental health care estimates includes; all behavioral health intervention according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

 Analysis and Close

The United States spends more than any other nation on health care, but it doesn’t generate better health outcomes than nations which spend 40% less. In 2024, the average industrialized nation spent $7,371 and the United States spent $14,885 per person for health care. (Peter G. Peterson Foundation.org, 2025) Yet life expectancy is lower in the U.S. than in Japan and most European nations. Even more egregious is life expectancy for people is reducing for the working population. Our young people are dying at earlier ages than their parents.

One of the reasons for the disparity is the U.S. spends far more on administering it’s terribly inefficient 50-states standards for private and government run health plans. Other nations use the money collected from taxes and private payers to actually pay for services. For example, long term care administration in the U.S. cost $1,079 versus $339 in France in 2023.

The United States of America, a nation for which my grandfather fought in the Revolutionary War to create, is failing to generate health for our children and those who work to pay for it. Yet, the Trump Administration is systematically gutting medical research, tax subsidies for the Affordable Care Act, government reporting on quality measures, and oversite for government and private sector agencies. A nation which starves its people is a nation in decline. If you aren’t familiar with the robber baron era, look it up, for the current administration wants to make us serfs in lifetime penury to the ultra rich.

And this is the healthpolicymaven signing off encouraging you not to sign blanket releases for inpatient procedures, do stipulate that for which you agree and decline. This article was written by independent journalist and healthcare analyst, Roberta Winter, who received no compensation from anyone in healthcare.

References

(n.d.). The Commonwealth Fund.

Brownstein, M. (2024, December 16). Private Equity's Appetite For Hospitals May Put Patients At Risk. Harvard, TH Chan School of Public Health. Retrieved November 3, 2025, from https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/private-equitys-appetite-for-hospitals-may-put-patients-at-risk/

Joan Stephenson, P. (2022, July 22). Rate of First Time Cesarean Deliveries On The Rise In The U.S. JAMA Health Forum, 2022;3;(7):e222824. doi:doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2824

Kaiser Family Foundation. (2024, October 9). Annual Family Premiums for Employer Coverage Rise 7% to Average $25,572 in 2024, Benchmark Survey Finds, After Also Rising 7% Last Year. Retrieved November 5, 2025, from Kaiser Family Foundation-Health Affairs: https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/annual-family-premiums-for-employer-coverage-rise-7-to-average-25572-in-2024-benchmark-survey-finds-after-also-rising-7-last-year/

Munira Z. Gunja, E. D. (2024, June 4). Insights into the U.S. Maternal Mortality Crisis: An International Comparison. The Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief. Retrieved November 9, 2025, from https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2024/jun/insights-us-maternal-mortality-crisis-international-comparison

Peter G. Peterson Foundation.org. (2025, October 7). How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries? Peter G. Peterson Foundation Brief. Retrieved November 10, 2025, from https://www.pgpf.org/article/how-does-the-us-healthcare-system-compare-to-other-countries/

Steven M. Schwartz, C. I. (2013). The Economic Value of a Wellness and Disease Prevention Program. Population Health Management, 13, 309-3017. doi:1942-7891

The Growth of Private Equity in US Health Care: Impact and Outlook. (2025). Retrieved from NIHCM.org: https://nihcm.org/publications/the-growth-of-private-equity-in-us-health-care-impact-and-outlook

Trust for America's Health.org. (2008). Prevention for a Healthier America. Trust for America's Health. Retrieved November 8, 2025, from https://www.tfah.org/report-details/prevention-for-a-healthier-america/#:~:text=The%20report's%20conclusions%20include:%20*%20An%20investment,ways%20we%20could%20reduce%20health%20care%20costs

Washington State Healthcare Authority. (2025, November 9). Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver-Foundational Community Supports Program. Retrieved from Washington State Healthcare Authority: https://www.hca.wa.gov/about-hca/programs-and-initiatives/medicaid-transformation-project-mtp/foundational-community-supports

Winter, R. E. (2016, September 3). Hospital Closures and the Impact on Health Services. Straight Talk On Healthcare. Retrieved November 7, 2025, from https://healthpolicymaven.blogspot.com/2016/09/hospital-closures-in-united-states-and.html

Winter, R. E. (2022, August 26). Pregnancy in the US Just Got More Dangerous-Post Dobbs v Jackson Decision. Retrieved November 10, 2025, from healthpolicymaven.blogspot.com: https://healthpolicymaven.blogspot.com/2022/08/pregnancy-in-us-just-got-more-dangerous.html

 

 


 [RW1]I will provide a citation here