Search This Blog

Friday, May 15, 2026

Social Prescribing and Low-cost Community Health Inverventions-A Global View

 

Applying Low-cost Community Health Interventions to Enhance Health in the United States

The United States consists of two Americas, one for the urbanized and another for rural health care and they are vastly different This article explores how the application of low-cost health care interventions in other countries may benefit residents in rural America. Places that lack access to hospitals, clinics, to mental health services, and of course, women’s health centers in other countries have similarities to parts of rural America.  

Leveraging trained volunteers to educate and assist public health initiatives in rural areas is widely practiced in Africa. (He, 2019) There is great variety between services for urban and remote health care. Rural services tend to focus on preventive care, primary health care, and family planning. In the United States, rural health care is less available for family planning, as reproductive health clinics are generally in cities. Some states do not have reproductive health clinics at all, due to the state restrictions on birth control and obstetrics care. It is no longer uncommon in the United States for a woman to travel out of state for an abortion or obstetric care. The chart shows examples of community health resourcing in Africa for remote, rural, and urban environments and all rely on volunteers for community outreach.

Country

Focus

Location

Malawi

Health Surveillance Associates focus on preventive, curative, family planning

Rural/remote

Mozambique

Community Health Volunteers and Community Health Extension Workers focus on prevention, family planning

Rural/nonremote

Kenya

Community Health Volunteers and Community Health Extension Workers focus on prevention

Urban

 

Measures of Quality

Capturing quality measures in terms of outcomes and potential health metrics is uneven for community health centers, because there is so much variety. Of the entities reviewed for this article, all used the Plan-Do-Act-Cycle for implementation of health interventions.

Findings

1.       Community and preventive health interventions are often not funded or underfunded because they don’t provide immediate quantifiable benefits, like number of hospitalization discharges, clinic visits, etc.

2.       Legal and regulatory barriers to reverse engineer the health system and develop low-cost high-value health improvements. Thoughtful legal and regulatory changes should include review of health interventions that have yielded high value at a low public cost from nations outside the USA. The health care regulatory climate in the US feeds a siloed system of invested profit centers, which lack systemic coordination and are often at odds in targeted health goals. (Rowthorn V & 28314501., 2016)

Social Prescribing-Nonclinical services to improve health and well-being.

In April 2024, a paper was published in Science Direct, showing the comparative results of twelve high-income countries, including the United States, which reviewed the impact of non-clinical community health referrals and interventions to determine impact on health and well-being. (Giada Scarpetti, 2024)

Methods of social prescribing include a community navigator, a concept which was widely deployed for the Affordable Care Act enrollments in the U.S. Referrals for housing, health care enrollment, and nutritional guides are examples of social determinants of health. There are other community activities which are low or no-cost which also improve quality of life, including; community gardens, access to green space through parks and wildlands, targeted support like twelve-step programs, access to public libraries, listening to music, and engaging in creative activities, like learning to play a musical instrument.

Current evidence is weak to show the effectiveness of community programs in health improvement for people with multiple comorbidities and social deprivation. (Giada Scarpetti, 2024) In other words, if you have substantial health problems, community programs are a band aid on a suppurating wound. However, as an outreach tool to promote health and channel individuals into optimal patient-centered care community navigators can be effective. In the United States, these programs are funded through grants and demonstration projects. In Europe, the national health programs may provide funding for navigators and other community programs which are linked to positive health outcomes. The goal for community health outreach is to reach more people in dispersed communities earlier in the health paradigm for prevention and resourcing. Communities that have different social determinants for health, such as diet, location, education, and even religion have been shown to exhibit different approaches to health management, diagnosis, and intervention. For example, the secular community may be uncomfortable with church involvement in health promotion, but for people who are members of spiritual groups, this may be the first point of intervention for health awareness regarding mental and behavioral health.

In the United States, the primary organization promoting social prescribing is Social Prescribing USA. It has sponsored a national conference and the second one is set for October 2026. It has a 50-state initiative partnering with Kaiser Health on social prescribing. The link shows the program map for social prescribing projects across the USA. https://www.socialprescribingusa.com/program-map

Community-based nontraditional health interventions in the United States

Project Connection out of West Valley City, Utah, connects people with mental health concerns to supportive community resources to foster well-being. https://www.projectconnection.co/

Project Enhance in Seattle, Washington has two prongs for seniors, one for fall reduction and one for enhancing wellness. It does provide evidence-based analysis of the coaching process, which is rare for community-based efforts. https://projectenhance.org/

 Open Source Wellness out of Oakland, California promotes 8 to 16 weeks of coaching for wellness behaviors through community health centers. It coined the term experiential medicine and is focused on behavioral health to motivate change. One of its’ outreach efforts is partnering through YMCA’s. (Open Source Wellness, 2026)

Baylor University is partnering with Blue Cross Blue Shield to assess the impacts of community art programs on health & wellness.

Arts on Prescription, in Winston-Salem, North Carolina has an arts outreach program with recommendations from geriatricians for seniors through arts and movement. Wake-Forest University is leading a study on movement therapy as a method to promote neuro cognitive health. https://improvment.wfu.edu/ https://improvment.wfu.edu/research/active-studies/

Social RX in Atlanta, Georgia works with community-based organizations to provide mental and social well being for people who may have barriers to traditional care. The goal of the organization is to combat loneliness for protective and therapeutic health benefits. Social RX has partnered with arts organizations in ten states and is working on reaching fifty states. https://www.socialrx.com/about

Capturing the Results of Well Being Efforts

The University of Florida Center for Arts in Medicine is conducting epidemiological research on the impact of the arts on health and well-being. It has amassed hundreds of studies on the epidemiologic impact of art on well-being measures, such as anxiety reduction, pain abatement, and reduction in fatigue. The challenge in gaining widespread support for community organizations linked to health is the research, especially where controls and randomization have been used, is the failure to show a reduction in anxiety meaningfully impacts health metrics, such as hypertension, compared to traditional prescription intervention. Their site lists a randomized control study of 112 patients in the United Kingdom, which tested reductions in anxiety from listening to music with or without video, and were not found to be statistically significant for patients who were undergoing treatment for cancer or orthopedics. (Eckhouse, et al., 2014) However, a randomized controlled trial from the University of Minnesota School of Music, published in 2018, showed a statistically significant impact from the use of music in pain abatement for adult oncology patients in a blood and bone marrow unit. (Reimnitz, 2020)

The scientific proof that social engineering through informal community organizations positively impacts health outcomes is thin, but there have been multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that show a statistically significant (measurable) impact from the art intervention. It is important to note, this does not mean the result would be considered significant in the real-world clinical application for participants. Scientifically measurable does not mean relevant to daily practice applications for the individual or the clinician.

Summary

We have learned that volunteers are essential to support community health efforts, especially in rural areas and training for a more intensive outreach could have a long-term impact payoff for a modest investment. Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that art, especially with music, has significant benefits for health and well-being, which means we should be investing more in these programs and studying the scientific impact on the mind and body. Of course, this is counter to the Trump Administration’s approach of taking a wrecking ball to the National Health Institute, the National Endowment for the Arts, universities, and any organization practicing scientific research. All to support tax breaks for billionaires and a war in the middle east. Ironically, as the tax credits for basic health care for the working-class are expiring, Americans must provide free health care for life for Trump and Melania. As an homage to Mrs. Trump’s jacket scrawled with “I really don’t care do you?” Yes mam, I really do care that tens of millions of Americans are losing their health care, and another million have lost their jobs.”

And this is the healthpolicymaven signing off encouraging you not to sign blanket releases when agreeing to medical procedures, so specify that for which you consent and decline. Having a POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) agreement on file with your primary care provider is also a good idea. https://polst.org/for-patients/

This column has been in continuous publication since 2007 and no remuneration is received for the opinions of healthcare analyst and journalist, Roberta E. Winter.

References

Eckhouse, D. R., Hurd, M., Cotter-Schaufele, S., Sulo, S., Sokolowski, M., & Barbour, L. (2014). A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Effects of Music and Relaxation Interventions on Perceived Anxiety in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Orthopaedic or Cancer Treatment. 33(6):p 342-351(November/December 2014.). doi:10.1097/NOR.0000000000000098

Giada Scarpetti, H. S. (2024, April). A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries. Health Policy, Volume 142,(104992). doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992

He, ". a.-t.-c.-i. (2019, August 16). Costs of Integrating Close to Community Programs in Five Low-income Countries. British Medical Journal Global Health, 2019: 4(4 (4) e001390), 5507. Retrieved April 15, 2026, from https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA596166683&v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&u=wash_main&p=GIC&aty=ip#:~:text=Costs%20of%20integrating%20quality%20improvement%20into%20close%2Dto%2Dcommunity%20health%20programmes%20in%20five%20low%2Dincome%20and%20middle%2Dinco

Reimnitz, L. &. (2020, December 2). A randomized pilot study of music therapy in the form of patient-preferred live music on fatigue, energy and pain in hospitalized adult oncology patients on a blood and marrow transplant unit. Arts & Health, 154-168. doi:10.1080/17533015.2018.1534251

Rowthorn V, P. A.-D., & 28314501., 8.-1. d. (2016, Nov-Dec). Legal and Regulatory Barriers to Reverse Innovation. Ann Glob Health, 2016 Nov-Dec; 28314501, 991-1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2016.10.013