Acute shortages in prescription drugs in the United States are deferring and changing treatment for everything from cancer to antibiotics. Medical centers have succumbed to warehousing supplies for fear of running out. Global manufacturing and distribution centers for drugs have not kept up with demand. Pharmaceutical companies indicate there is not enough money in generic drugs to economically afford to manufacture them. Policymakers also blame the gatekeepers, the pharmacy group purchasing organizations or PBM’s, which exert outsize control over the supply of drugs by depressing the price for large employer groups. Group purchasing organizations are generally located outside the U.S. and are not subject to national regulations. Group purchasing organizations are designed to leverage volume to lower prices. Some pharmacy benefit management groups have created their own group purchasing entities. In general, PBM’s dictate which drugs the insurance plan will cover, hence driving utilization, but not necessarily the public price of drugs, whereas GPOs are all about price reduction. Clinicians and pharmaceutical companies indicate this is restricting the availability of life saving medications.
Companies that Control Drug Pricing and Supply in the US
The largest pharmacy benefit managers (PBM’s) are:
Express Scripts-Cigna
Optum-United Healthcare
According to the Drug Channels web site, the largest drug group purchasing organizations are:
Ascent Health Services-based in Switzerland but licensed as
an LLC in Delaware. Cigna, Kroger, and Prime Therapeutics, own stakes in this
company.
Emisar Pharma Services is part of United Healthcare’s Optum,
headquarter in Ireland and an LLC in Delaware.
Zinc Health Services, owned by CVS is US based
Senator Ron Wyden, Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee convened
a hearing on drug shortages December 5, 2023. Findings included the recommendation
that Congress reform the Medicare Drug Rebate Program which encourages these
large drug purchasing entities to capture up to 13% of drug costs in the form
of rebates. The rebates which were meant to lower the cost of drugs are not necessarily
shared with customers, instead add to corporate profits. Reform ideas include
mandating the drug companies repay rebates if they raise prices faster than
inflation and exempting some sterile injectables from the rebate program, which
could increase supply.
Findings include:
1. Drug maker reformulations of drugs with minor modifications
extend patents, keeping prices higher, and restricting the availability of
generic drugs.
2. FDA’s rules regarding labeling also prevent generic drug
manufacturers from entering the US market, even though their drugs are safe and used in
other markets.
3. Half of the pharmaceutical manufacturers said the FDA needs
to take a more active role in tracking generic drug-device combinations,
because brand name sponsors are not required to submit information on
identifying which patents are related to the device part of a drug-device
combination product (example-insulin pump).
4. Half of the stakeholders indicated confusion or unnecessary
delays in market entry are due to the overly broad and ambiguous codes for
labeling (page 19 of the GAO report) and the FDA agreed with this conclusion.
5. Two of the participants felt that brand name sponsors may
delay entry of generic drug device combination products by shifting active
ingredients from older products into newer ones with patent extensions, and in
some cases, remove their older more affordable products from the marketplace altogether.
A literature review found that this practice led to 28 years of extended patent
protection on inhalers from 1986 to 2020, which is another form of price
gouging.
6. Many of the conference participants expressed concern that
the FDA was outgunned by the legal resources of the pharmaceutical companies.
There has not been an FDA rule change on drug-device combination products
since 2016.
The American Medical Association has recently announced its
support for government or a greater role for nonprofits to manufacture drugs.
Of course, this would not work for the biologics, which are subject to
trademark protection, but it would work for generic drugs. The federal
government already provides most of the funding for initial research on drug
development through National Institutes of Health grants to universities and
health centers. The private market approach to supply and demand is failing at
the cost of human lives. It is well known people died during Covid because they
could not obtain their infusions or other drugs, but this phenomenon is still
ongoing. A recent New York Times article cited severe shortages in chemotherapy
even at well-funded medical centers like the Mayo Clinic.
This column has been in continuous publication since 2007 and is written by Roberta E. Winter, an independent healthcare analyst and journalist who accepts no money from any sector of US healthcare. Opinions are strictly her own and supported by full citations. She is the author of Unraveling U.S. Healthcare-A Personal Guide, published by Rowman & Littlefield in 2013.
https://www.amazon.com/Unraveling-U-S-Health-Care-Personal/dp/1442222972
Adam Fein, P. (2023, May 24). Five (or Maybe
Six?) Reasons that the Largest PBMs Operate Group Purchasing Organizations.
Retrieved from Drug Channels:
https://www.drugchannels.net/2023/05/five-or-maybe-six-reasons-that-largest.html
Government Accountability Office. (2023, March). Generic
Drugs-Stakeholder Views on Improving FDA's Information on Patents.
doi:GAO 43-105477
Hunt, S. (2023, December 8). WASHINGTON
HIGHLIGHTS-Senate Finance Committee Holds Hearing Examning Drug Shortages.
Retrieved from AAMC.org:
https://www.aamc.org/advocacy-policy/washington-highlights/senate-finance-committee-holds-hearing-examining-drug-shortages
Jewitt, C. (2023). "I'm Scared to
Death,"Behind the Shortage Keeping Cancer Patients from Chemo. New
York City: The New York Times. Retrieved 12 19, 2023, from
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/19/health/cancer-drug-shortage.html
No comments:
Post a Comment